The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced us many harsh classes. Importantly, it has proven us how simple it’s to fabricate panic and control entire populations through deceptive means. Topping the listing of misleading methods is using a check that falsely labels wholesome people as sick and infectious. This permits mass testing to drive the narrative that we’re in a deadly pandemic.

Of course, I am speaking in regards to the now notorious reverse transcription polymerase chain response (RT-PCR) check. The actual fact is, the PCR check just isn’t designed to be used as a diagnostic instrument because it can not distinguish between inactive viruses and “reside” or reproductive ones.1

It is a essential level, since inactive and reproductive viruses will not be interchangeable when it comes to infectivity. When you’ve got a nonreproductive virus in your physique, you’ll not get sick and you can’t unfold it to others. Secondly, many if not most laboratories amplify the RNA collected far too many instances, which ends up in wholesome individuals testing “constructive.”

The Essential Element That Nullifies Most PCR Take a look at Outcomes

The video above explains how the PCR check works and the way we’re decoding outcomes incorrectly. In abstract, the PCR swab collects RNA out of your nasal cavity. This RNA is then reverse transcribed into DNA. Attributable to its tiny dimension, it have to be amplified to grow to be discernible. Every spherical of amplification known as a cycle, and the variety of amplification cycles utilized by any given check or lab known as a cycle threshold (CT).

The upper the CT, the larger the chance that insignificant sequences of viral DNA find yourself being magnified to the purpose that the check reads constructive even when your viral load is extraordinarily low or the virus is inactive and poses no risk to you or anybody else.

Many scientists have famous that something over 35 cycles is scientifically indefensible.2,3,4 A September 28, 2020, examine5 in Scientific Infectious Ailments revealed that once you run a PCR check at a CT of 35 or larger, the accuracy drops to three%, leading to a 97% false constructive price.

But, a check referred to as the Corman-Drosten paper and assessments beneficial by the World Well being Group are set to 45 cycles,6,7,8 and the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration and the U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention advocate operating PCR assessments at a CT of 40.9

The query is why, contemplating the consensus is that CTs over 35 render the check ineffective. When labs use these extreme cycle thresholds, you clearly find yourself with a grossly overestimated variety of constructive assessments, so what we’re actually coping with is a “casedemic”10,11 — an epidemic of false positives.

Many at the moment are questioning whether or not this was accomplished on goal to crash the worldwide financial system and present cowl for the implementation of what is referred to as the Great Reset, which is nothing lower than a global totalitarian takeover by unelected technocrats who search to gobble up all of the world’s belongings.

Certainly, it appears fairly clear we’re not coping with a deadly pandemic in any actual sense. Mortality statistics additional show that is the case, as total mortality statistics have remained secure in 2020 and consistent with earlier years.12,13,14

In different phrases, persons are dying from COVID-19, sure, however the sickness just isn’t killing an extra variety of individuals. The identical variety of individuals would have died anyway, from one thing. Certainly, CDC information15 launched August 26, 2020, confirmed solely 6% of so-called COVID-19 deaths had COVID-19 listed as the only trigger on the loss of life certificates.

“For deaths with situations or causes as well as to COVID-19, on common, there have been 2.6 extra situations or causes per loss of life,” the CDC said, and any a type of comorbidities might have killed these individuals even when COVID-19 was nonexistent.

For Accuracy, A lot Decrease CTs Should Be Used

Now, if CTs above 35 are scientifically unjustified, simply how low of a CT needs to be used? Fairly a few research have investigated this, so there is no scarcity of knowledge at this level. The truth that the WHO, FDA and CDC nonetheless haven’t modified their CTs downward in gentle of all these information tells us they are not curious about getting an correct image of the an infection price.

For instance, an April 2020 examine16 within the European Journal of Scientific Microbiology & Infectious Ailments confirmed that to get 100% confirmed actual positives, the PCR check have to be run at 17 cycles. Above 17 cycles, accuracy drops dramatically.

By the time you get to 33 cycles, the accuracy price is a mere 20%, which means 80% are false positives. Past 34 cycles, your probability of a constructive PCR check being a true constructive shrinks to zero.

Extra just lately, a December 3, 2020, systematic evaluation17 revealed within the journal of Scientific Infectious Ailments assessed the findings of 29 totally different research — all of which have been revealed in 2020 — evaluating proof of SARS-CoV-2 an infection with the CTs utilized in testing.

As reported by the authors, “12 research reported that CT values have been considerably decrease … in specimens producing reside virus tradition.” In different phrases, the upper the CT, the decrease the prospect of a constructive check truly being as a result of presence of reside (and infectious) virus.

“Two research reported the chances of reside virus tradition decreased by roughly 33% for each one unit enhance in CT,” the authors famous. Importantly, 5 of the research included have been unable to establish any reside viruses in instances the place a constructive PCR check had used a CT above 24. What’s extra, with the intention to produce reside virus tradition, a affected person whose PCR check used a CT at or above 35 needed to be symptomatic.

So, to summarize, if in case you have signs of COVID-19 and check constructive utilizing a PCR check that was run at 35 amplification cycles or larger, then you might be more likely to be contaminated and infectious.

Nevertheless, in the event you would not have signs, but check constructive utilizing a PCR check run at 35 CTs or larger, then it’s seemingly a false constructive and also you pose no danger to others as you are unlikely to hold any reside virus. The truth is, supplied you are asymptomatic, you are unlikely to be infectious even in the event you check constructive with a check run at 24 CTs or larger.

Fearmongering Success Hinges on Incorrect Use of PCR Take a look at

The video above contains a number of interviews with specialists who’ve brazenly criticized using PCR testing to diagnose infections corresponding to COVID-19. These embrace:

The inventor of the PCR check, the late Kary Mullis (he has spoken in regards to the check for different infections, corresponding to HIV, however died in August 2019, just a few months earlier than the COVID-19 pandemic broke out)

Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a former vice-president and chief scientific adviser of the drug firm Pfizer

Professor Carl Heneghan, director of the Oxford College Middle for Proof-Primarily based Medication

Emeritus professor of immunology Beda M. Stadler, former head of the Bern Institute of Immunology

Clare Craig, a guide pathologist

Stephen A. Bustin, professor of molecular medication and a world-renowned professional on the PCR check

In 1993, Mullis spoke about using the PCR check to diagnose HIV. He defined that each one the check does is amplify molecules into one thing you’ll be able to detect, but it surely can not let you know whether or not these particles truly pose a danger to your well being.

He additionally factors out that, utilizing PCR, you’ll be able to basically discover absolutely anything in anybody as a result of most of us are strolling round with pathogens of all kinds, however the load is both too low to be of concern or the particles are simply useless particles that pose no danger.

Bustin factors out that once you get a constructive outcome utilizing a CT of 35 or larger, you are trying on the equal of a single copy of viral DNA. The chance of that inflicting a well being downside is minuscule. Even Dr. Anthony Fauci has admitted that utilizing a PCR check with a CT above 35 renders it roughly ineffective as a result of at that time, you are simply detecting useless nucelotides. No reside virus could be detected at CTs that top.

Deadly Errors Present in Paper on Which PCR Testing Is Primarily based

November 30, 2020, a staff of twenty-two worldwide scientists revealed a evaluation18 difficult the scientific paper19 on PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 written by Christian Drosten, Ph.D., and Victor Corman. The Corman-Drosten paper was shortly accepted by the WHO and the workflow described therein was adopted as the usual internationally.

In keeping with Reiner Fuellmich,20 founding member of the German Corona Further-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss,21 or ACU),22,23 Drosten is a key perpetrator within the COVID-19 pandemic hoax.

The scientists demand the Corman-Drosten paper be retracted as a consequence of “deadly errors,”24 considered one of which is the truth that it was written (and the check itself developed) earlier than any viral isolate was obtainable. All they used was the genetic sequence revealed on-line by Chinese language scientists in January 2020.

The truth that the paper was revealed a mere 24 hours after it was submitted additionally suggests it did not even endure peer evaluation. In an Undercover DC interview, Kevin Corbett, Ph.D., one of many 22 scientists who at the moment are demanding the paper’s retraction, said:25

“Each scientific rationale for the event of that check has been completely destroyed by this paper. It is like Hiroshima/Nagasaki to the COVID check.

When Drosten developed the check, China hadn’t given them a viral isolate. They developed the check from a sequence in a gene financial institution. Do you see? China gave them a genetic sequence with no corresponding viral isolate. That they had a code, however no physique for the code. No viral morphology.

Within the fish market, it is like providing you with just a few bones and saying ‘that is your fish.’ It may very well be any fish … Pay attention, the Corman-Drosten paper, there’s nothing from a affected person in it. It is all from gene banks. And the bits of the virus sequence that weren’t there they made up.

They synthetically created them to fill within the blanks. That is what genetics is; it is a code. So, its ABBBCCDDD and also you’re lacking some, what you suppose is EEE, so you set it in … That is principally a pc virus.

There are 10 deadly errors on this Drosten check paper … However right here is the underside line: There was no viral isolate to validate what they have been doing. The PCR merchandise of the amplification did not correspond to any viral isolate at the moment. I name it ‘donut ring science.’ There’s nothing on the heart of it. It is all about code, genetics, nothing to do with actuality …

There have since been papers saying they’ve produced viral isolates. However there are not any controls for them. The CDC produced a paper in July … the place they stated: ‘Here is the viral isolate.’ Have you learnt what they did? They swabbed one particular person. One particular person, who’d been to China and had chilly signs. One particular person. And so they assumed he had [COVID-19] to start with. So, it is all stuffed with holes, the entire thing.

The conclusion of the evaluation reads, partly:26

“A call to acknowledge the errors obvious within the Corman-Drosten paper has the profit to enormously reduce human value and struggling going ahead. Is it not in one of the best curiosity of Eurosurveillance to retract this paper? Our conclusion is obvious. Within the face of all of the super PCR-protocol design flaws and errors described right here, we conclude: There’s not a lot of a alternative left within the framework of scientific integrity and duty.”

The critique in opposition to PCR testing is additional strengthened by a November 20, 2020, examine27 in Nature Communications, which discovered no viable virus in PCR-positive instances at all. The examine evaluated information from 9,865,404 residents of Wuhan, China, who had undergone PCR testing between Could 14 and June 1, 2020.

A complete of 300 examined constructive however had no signs. Of the 34,424 individuals with a historical past of COVID-19, 107 examined constructive a second time. But, after they did virus cultures on these 407 people who had examined constructive (both for the first or second time), no reside virus was present in any of them!

Antibody Exams Are Equally Unreliable

Antibody assessments are additionally turning out to have their share of high quality issues. When you’ve got antibodies in opposition to SARS-CoV-2, that will be proof that your immune system efficiently overcame the virus in some unspecified time in the future up to now. Nevertheless, the COVID-19 antibody check might also end up constructive if in case you have antibodies in opposition to frequent chilly viruses.

June 30, 2020, the CDC admitted that prior publicity to coronaviruses liable for the frequent chilly may end up in a constructive COVID-19 antibody check, even in the event you’ve by no means been uncovered to SARS-CoV-2 particularly.28

The saving grace is that research29,30,31 recommend antibodies produced following publicity to coronaviruses that trigger the frequent chilly additionally seem to offer some normal and long-lasting resistance in opposition to SARS-CoV-2.

One such examine,32,33 revealed Could 14, 2020, within the journal Cell, discovered 70% of samples from sufferers who had recovered from delicate instances of COVID-19 had resistance to SARS-CoV-2 on the T-cell degree, as did 40% to 60% of individuals who had not been uncovered to SARS-CoV-2.

In keeping with the authors, this implies there’s “cross-reactive T cell recognition between circulating ‘frequent chilly’ coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-2.” In different phrases, in the event you’ve recovered from a typical chilly brought on by a specific coronavirus, your humoral immune system might activate once you encounter SARS-CoV-2, thus rendering you proof against COVID-19.

One other examine34 found SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies are solely present in probably the most extreme instances — about 1 in 5. So, a unfavorable antibody check does not essentially rule out the chance that you’ve got been contaminated and did not get sick. The truth is, this discovering suggests COVID-19 might truly be 5 instances extra prevalent than suspected — and 5 instances much less lethal than predicted.

In a letter to the editor35 revealed within the July 1, 2020, problem of American Household Doctor, Drs. Mark Ebell, deputy editor for evidence-based medication for the journal, and Henry Barry, reviewed a number of the obtainable information, noting that:

“When assessing whether or not sufferers had a earlier an infection and could also be immune, you will need to keep away from false-positives in order that sufferers don’t suppose they’re immune when they don’t seem to be.

Desk 1 summarizes the false-positive charges at numerous inhabitants prevalence for the Cellex check and for a hypothetical check that’s 90% delicate and 99% particular. At comparatively low inhabitants prevalences, which seemingly replicate present situations in the USA and elsewhere, we might argue that false-positive charges are unacceptably excessive with the Cellex check.”

antibody testing for covid-19

Ebell and Barry identified that lots of the antibody tests which have provisional approval from the FDA nonetheless haven’t even been evaluated for accuracy. In addition they beneficial that labs report check outcomes “in a means that displays the native inhabitants prevalence primarily based on widespread testing and embrace the false-positive price,” as this data “is required to assist household physicians higher inform shared decision-making relating to earlier an infection and return to work or college.”

At current, you’d be hard-pressed to search out anybody together with that information of their reporting, and the means issues are going, I would not maintain my breath in anticipation of such useful numbers being included sooner or later both.

Excessive Time to Finish Mass Testing Rip-off

If the huge majority of people that check constructive for COVID-19 an infection haven’t any signs, do not feel sick and do not look sick, is COVID-19 actually a “lethal” illness? Or, is it extra like HPV — a viral an infection that most individuals have with out realizing it, and which 90% are in a position to remove with out remedy?

The first justification for the tyrannical governmental interventions of COVID-19 was to gradual the unfold of the an infection in order that hospital assets wouldn’t be overwhelmed, inflicting individuals to die as a consequence of lack of medical care.

These interventions weren’t about stopping the unfold altogether and even decreasing the variety of individuals that will ultimately get contaminated. They actually have been by no means meant to forestall all loss of life. Any rational evaluation would quickly conclude that this merely is not doable, below any circumstance.

Brief-term stay-at-home orders and enterprise closings have been solely supposed to decelerate the unfold so that, ultimately, naturally-acquired herd immunity — one of the best form — would stop it from reemerging. But the purpose posts hold shifting as we go alongside.

Two-week lockdowns become months in some areas. Ultimately, we have been instructed every thing would return to regular as quickly as a vaccine grew to become obtainable. However as soon as the vaccines began rolling out, the narrative modified once more, and we have been instructed we would nonetheless want masks, social distancing and lockdowns nicely into 2021 and even 2022 even with a vaccine. What, precisely, is occurring?

The one rational purpose for why authorities interventions proceed is as a result of they’re meant to erode our private freedoms and civil liberties and switch wealth to unelected technocrats who’re controlling the pandemic narrative. It is all fearmongering primarily based on a mix of wildly manipulated information and flawed assessments.

Apart from PCR testing information, there is no proof of a deadly pandemic in any respect. As talked about, whereas there’s such a factor as COVID-19, and other people have and do die from it, there are not any extra deaths as a consequence of it.36,37,38 The entire mortality for 2020 is regular.

So, except we suppose we should always shut down the world and cease dwelling as a result of individuals die from coronary heart illness, diabetes, most cancers, the flu or anything, then there is no purpose to close down the world as a result of some individuals occur to die from COVID-19.

What You Can Do

The excellent news is the hoax is beginning to be uncovered. In November 2020, a Portuguese appeals court docket dominated39,40 that the PCR check is “not a dependable check for SARS-CoV-2” and that “a single constructive PCR check can’t be used as an efficient analysis of an infection.” Due to this fact, “any enforced quarantine primarily based on the outcomes is illegal.”41 The court docket additionally famous that forcing wholesome individuals to self-isolate may very well be a violation of their basic proper to liberty.

As detailed in “Coronavirus Fraud Scandal — The Biggest Fight Has Just Begun” and “German Lawyers Initiate Class-Action Coronavirus Litigation,” extra authorized instances are additionally to be anticipated, all of which is able to assist expose the fraud perpetrated. As for what you can do within the meantime, contemplate:

  • Turning off mainstream media information and turning to impartial specialists — do the analysis. Learn by way of the science.
  • Proceed to counter the censorship by asking questions — arm your self with mortality statistics and the details on PCR testing, so you’ll be able to clarify how and why this pandemic merely is not a pandemic anymore.
  • If you’re a medical skilled, particularly in the event you’re a member of an expert society, write an open letter to your authorities, urging them to talk to and heed suggestions from impartial specialists.
  • Signal The Great Barrington Declaration,42 which requires an finish to lockdowns.
  • Be part of a bunch so that you just can have help — Examples of teams shaped to struggle in opposition to authorities overreach embrace Us for Them, a bunch campaigning for reopening faculties and defending youngsters’s rights within the U.Ok., and the Freedom to Breathe Agency, a U.S. staff of attorneys, medical doctors, enterprise homeowners and fogeys who’re preventing to guard freedom and liberty.